sanjaysgk/WES_RNA_Pipeline
None
Overview
Latest release: None, Last update: 2025-09-25
Linting: linting: failed, Formatting: formatting: failed
Wrappers: bio/bwa-mem2/mem bio/fastqc bio/multiqc
Deployment
Step 1: Install Snakemake and Snakedeploy
Snakemake and Snakedeploy are best installed via the Conda. It is recommended to install conda via Miniforge. Run
conda create -c conda-forge -c bioconda -c nodefaults --name snakemake snakemake snakedeploy
to install both Snakemake and Snakedeploy in an isolated environment. For all following commands ensure that this environment is activated via
conda activate snakemake
For other installation methods, refer to the Snakemake and Snakedeploy documentation.
Step 2: Deploy workflow
With Snakemake and Snakedeploy installed, the workflow can be deployed as follows. First, create an appropriate project working directory on your system and enter it:
mkdir -p path/to/project-workdir
cd path/to/project-workdir
In all following steps, we will assume that you are inside of that directory. Then run
snakedeploy deploy-workflow https://github.com/sanjaysgk/WES_RNA_Pipeline . --tag None
Snakedeploy will create two folders, workflow
and config
. The former contains the deployment of the chosen workflow as a Snakemake module, the latter contains configuration files which will be modified in the next step in order to configure the workflow to your needs.
Step 3: Configure workflow
To configure the workflow, adapt config/config.yml
to your needs following the instructions below.
Step 4: Run workflow
The deployment method is controlled using the --software-deployment-method
(short --sdm
) argument.
To run the workflow using apptainer
/singularity
, use
snakemake --cores all --sdm apptainer
To run the workflow using a combination of conda
and apptainer
/singularity
for software deployment, use
snakemake --cores all --sdm conda apptainer
To run the workflow with automatic deployment of all required software via conda
/mamba
, use
snakemake --cores all --sdm conda
Snakemake will automatically detect the main Snakefile
in the workflow
subfolder and execute the workflow module that has been defined by the deployment in step 2.
For further options such as cluster and cloud execution, see the docs.
Step 5: Generate report
After finalizing your data analysis, you can automatically generate an interactive visual HTML report for inspection of results together with parameters and code inside of the browser using
snakemake --report report.zip
Configuration
The following section is imported from the workflow’s config/README.md
.
Workflow overview
This workflow is a best-practice workflow for <detailed description>
.
The workflow is built using snakemake and consists of the following steps:
Download genome reference from NCBI
Validate downloaded genome (
python
script)Simulate short read sequencing data on the fly (
dwgsim
)Check quality of input read data (
FastQC
)Collect statistics from tool output (
MultiQC
)
Running the workflow
Input data
This template workflow creates artificial sequencing data in *.fastq.gz
format.
It does not contain actual input data.
The simulated input files are nevertheless created based on a mandatory table linked in the config.yaml
file (default: .test/samples.tsv
).
The sample sheet has the following layout:
sample |
condition |
replicate |
read1 |
read2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
sample1 |
wild_type |
1 |
sample1.bwa.read1.fastq.gz |
sample1.bwa.read2.fastq.gz |
sample2 |
wild_type |
2 |
sample2.bwa.read1.fastq.gz |
sample2.bwa.read2.fastq.gz |
Parameters
This table lists all parameters that can be used to run the workflow.
parameter |
type |
details |
default |
---|---|---|---|
samplesheet |
|||
path |
str |
path to samplesheet, mandatory |
“config/samples.tsv” |
get_genome |
|||
ncbi_ftp |
str |
link to a genome on NCBI’s FTP server |
link to S. cerevisiae genome |
simulate_reads |
|||
read_length |
num |
length of target reads in bp |
100 |
read_number |
num |
number of total reads to be simulated |
10000 |
Got it 👍 — we’ll adapt this README/workflow overview to your WES Mutation Calling Pipeline instead of the toy demo (genome download, dwgsim, etc.). |
Here’s a rewritten version that reflects your pipeline steps (Tumor/Normal WES, alignment, QC, variant calling, etc.):
WES Mutation Calling Pipeline
This workflow is a whole exome sequencing (WES) best-practice pipeline for detecting somatic variants from paired tumor/normal samples. The workflow is built using Snakemake and consists of the following steps:
Prepare references
Validate and index the reference genome (FASTA, dict, fai, BWA index)
Index known variant databases (dbSNP, etc.)
Quality control of raw data
Run FastQC on raw FASTQ reads
Summarize results with MultiQC
Alignment and BAM processing
Align tumor and normal samples with BWA-MEM2
Sort, index, and mark duplicates with GATK
Collect alignment QC metrics
Base quality score recalibration (BQSR)
Recalibrate BAMs using known sites
Apply recalibration
Somatic variant calling
Run GATK Mutect2 on paired tumor/normal
Filter calls and create final VCF
Variant QC & reporting
Generate summary statistics
Produce MultiQC report of all steps
Running the workflow
Input data
The workflow expects paired-end FASTQ files for both tumor and normal samples.
The input samples are described in a mandatory table defined in config/samples.tsv
.
Example layout:
sample_id |
type |
read1 |
read2 |
---|---|---|---|
ORG125 |
tumor |
ORG125T_Data_L1_1.fq.gz |
ORG125T_Data_L1_2.fq.gz |
ORG125 |
normal |
ORG125N_Data_L1_1.fq.gz |
ORG125N_Data_L1_2.fq.gz |
Parameters
This table lists all configurable parameters.
parameter |
type |
details |
default |
---|---|---|---|
samplesheet |
str |
path to sample sheet, mandatory |
|
ref_genome |
str |
path to reference FASTA |
|
known_sites |
str |
dbSNP / known indels VCF |
|
threads |
int |
number of CPU threads per job |
16 |
memory |
str |
memory per process |
19G |
Example run
Dry run (see planned steps):
snakemake -n --use-conda
Run on 16 cores with conda:
snakemake --cores 16 --use-conda
Run on SLURM cluster:
snakemake --profile slurm
🔥 This replaces the toy workflow with a real WES mutation calling pipeline while keeping the same structure and readability.
Do you want me to also rewrite the Snakefile
rules (alignment, BQSR, Mutect2, etc.) to match your bash pipeline? That way you’d have a fully automated Snakemake version of your script.
Linting and formatting
Linting results
1Workflow defines that rule get_genome is eligible for caching between workflows (use the --cache argument to enable this).
2Workflow defines that rule genome_faidx is eligible for caching between workflows (use the --cache argument to enable this).
3Workflow defines that rule genome_dict is eligible for caching between workflows (use the --cache argument to enable this).
4Workflow defines that rule bwa_index is eligible for caching between workflows (use the --cache argument to enable this).
5Lints for rule index_reference (line 24, /tmp/tmp27j8xxqz/workflow/rules/ref.smk):
6 * No log directive defined:
7 Without a log directive, all output will be printed to the terminal. In
8 distributed environments, this means that errors are harder to discover.
9 In local environments, output of concurrent jobs will be mixed and become
10 unreadable.
11 Also see:
12 https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/en/stable/snakefiles/rules.html#log-files
13 * Specify a conda environment or container for each rule.:
14 This way, the used software for each specific step is documented, and the
15 workflow can be executed on any machine without prerequisites.
16 Also see:
17 https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/en/latest/snakefiles/deployment.html#integrated-package-management
18 https://snakemake.readthedocs.io/en/latest/snakefiles/deployment.html#running-jobs-in-containers
Formatting results
1[DEBUG]
2[DEBUG]
3[DEBUG] In file "/tmp/tmp27j8xxqz/workflow/rules/qc.smk": Formatted content is different from original
4[DEBUG]
5[DEBUG] In file "/tmp/tmp27j8xxqz/workflow/rules/variant.smk": Formatted content is different from original
6[DEBUG]
7[DEBUG] In file "/tmp/tmp27j8xxqz/workflow/rules/ref.smk": Formatted content is different from original
8[DEBUG]
9[DEBUG] In file "/tmp/tmp27j8xxqz/workflow/rules/align.smk": Formatted content is different from original
10[DEBUG]
11[DEBUG] In file "/tmp/tmp27j8xxqz/workflow/Snakefile": Formatted content is different from original
12[DEBUG]
13[DEBUG]
14[DEBUG]
15[DEBUG] In file "/tmp/tmp27j8xxqz/workflow/rules/all.smk": Formatted content is different from original
16[DEBUG]
17[DEBUG] In file "/tmp/tmp27j8xxqz/workflow/rules/mapping.smk": Formatted content is different from original
18[DEBUG]
19[DEBUG]
20[INFO] 7 file(s) would be changed 😬
21[INFO] 5 file(s) would be left unchanged 🎉
22
23snakefmt version: 0.11.2